KeithP wrote:


Ah-ha, Craig Kelly rises to the defense of his family honor...


OMG, he is related to Peter?

Well I guess the lack of an expansive vocabulary should have told me that!

Peter Kelly is Frank Beazley's/Stephen Sykes biotch-I hear they take turns!

Post edited by: TRUTH, at: 2008/01/28 11:51

Savage wrote:
Are you out of your mind !!! Sue Uteck is a drunk lush and couldn't take the Mayor on even if she was sober !!

If you guys are for getting Peter out put somebodies name up that can bring the fight into city hall..

Hey Admin whats your take on this.. ??When I was on the Mayors Task Force on Drugs her hubby was supposed to show up for meetings as I and the group were in the Southend .....once in many years did he show up..now if she is a drunk I see why....at least he was not a hypocrite.

The entire council needs to be removed and investigated and criminal charged and incarcerated.

Post edited by: TRUTH, at: 2008/01/28 11:54

i would like to suggest that i would run against kelly if i had some backing.i am a member of a newly forming group known as the C.F.C.F.(CANADA FOR CANADIANS FIRSTY).we are dedicating ourselves to honest open politics with no new spending,and hidden agendas.we want fairness in debating,fuel pricing,and the general upkeep of any office we get.their has been too much corruption going on in all forms of government in the last 50 years.we want this removed now.there is no one that comes into power here or in the big seat that can remotely even give a hint of a promise for fair and honest policy.i would like to bring into law,a polygraph test for any candidate,thinking of entering a party,to undergo an honesty test.this meaning that they would be asked questions as to their integrity on key issues.wrong answers,and they are dropped from any chance they would have of getting in.also there should be an accountability clause stating that you,as the head person,are responsible for your underlings.wheneve they screw up.also,i would like to see more open city hall meetings with the local populace involved into any and all discussions.not the closed door type they have now.this goes really for all levals of government.also i would suggest putting a clause into the elections charter that gives any citizen,the right to voice his/her/their opinion on any/all platforms within said government.and to have no lawyers or previous elected official run for more than 2 terms in any political office.these are what i would base my mayoral platform on.true open,honest,and straight forward politics.can anyone else do better.then they should enter the race,so to speak.nominate me,i will be your real voice,not some puppet who jumps at the p.m.'s word.