Login
No account yet? Register
Dump Mayor Peter Kelly!
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.
Lost Password?
Should a council position be classidied full time? (1 viewing)
_GEN_GOTOBOTTOM Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Should a council position be classidied full time?
#149
admin (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 51
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Should a council position be classidied full time? 2007/08/27 16:40 Karma: 0  
As it stands at this time, the position of 'councillor' in the HRM is classified as a part time position.

Does it make sense to classify such an important position as part time?
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#153
eddie (User)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 14
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full ti 2007/08/27 18:57 Karma: 1  
Ehey do not have time to attend budget hearings.
Yet they can spend months running in elections
for other political posts (i.e, Fougere in the federal election),
at full time pay.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#155
admin (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 51
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full ti 2007/08/27 19:28 Karma: 0  
Yet another very important municipal politics issue that needs to be addressed.

You correctly point out Sheila Fougere's run at federal politics, while maintaining her council seat. However, I think you'll also find that see did not draw her salary during the campaign period.

That being said, if a provincial MLA wishes to seek higher office, such as a federal seat, that sitting MLA must resign their seat in order to run in a federal election.

The same law should apply to councillors?

Back to council - It's also important to note that as a sitting mayor, Peter Kelly has access to all the perks of his office during an election campaign. That includes drawing the mayor's salary while campaigning. That also goes for councillors as well.

The incumbents certainly have the upper hand.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#156
Contender (User)
Expert Boarder
Posts: 27
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full ti 2007/08/27 19:57 Karma: 0  
If you're elected to city council, it should be designated a full-time job. HRM is a big place and it deserves the full attention of all councilors. I've never agreed with the part-time designation.
Time for a Mayor of Champions!
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#157
KeithP (User)
Expert Boarder
Posts: 29
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full ti 2007/08/27 20:50 Karma: -1  
Contender wrote:
If you're elected to city council, it should be designated a full-time job. HRM is a big place and it deserves the full attention of all councilors. I've never agreed with the part-time designation.

The problem is that unless you really jack the salary high, you will end up with either unemployable people like Dawn Sloane or retired types. The business types you want in those positions wouldn't be able to run.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#163
eddie (User)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 14
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full ti 2007/08/28 21:54 Karma: 1  
Not only the incumbant, but all councillors have an advantage over new folks, regardless of the level. they seek.

If most employees want to run in politics, they must take a unpaid leave of absence. Let's face it, most councillors, are politically associated, and the job is just a stepping stone for another job, federal or provincial.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#164
Poster (User)
Junior Boarder
Posts: 8
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full time? 2007/08/28 22:32 Karma: 0  
Becky Kent is running for MLA when she is still a councillor .
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#166
GoodByeKelly (User)
Junior Boarder
Posts: 6
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full time? 2007/08/29 01:04 Karma: -1  
According to Halifax.ca, the councillors are paid at $39,089.90. This seems to me to be a fair enough salary to be classified full time. But do they do a full time job?
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#167
GoodByeKelly (User)
Junior Boarder
Posts: 6
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full time? 2007/08/29 01:05 Karma: -1  
According to Halifax.ca, the councillors are paid at $39,089.90. This seems to me to be a fair enough salary to be classified full time. But do they do a full time job?
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#170
KeithP (User)
Expert Boarder
Posts: 29
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full time? 2007/08/29 07:47 Karma: -1  
GoodByeKelly wrote:
According to Halifax.ca, the councillors are paid at $39,089.90.

That is as of 2001 and is now incorrect. I cannot find a reference on the site but I know that the salary moved up to the low $50K range last year and is supposed to go to the $58-59K range next year.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#171
eddie (User)
Senior Boarder
Posts: 14
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Should a council position be classidied full time? 2007/08/29 07:53 Karma: 1  
I believe it was raised to the mid 50's a few years ago, noting it was full time.
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
_GEN_GOTOTOP Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop